Nevertheless, Var Günter Perl and his apart from specialized VAR assistant Norbert Grudzinski did not step in. The irregular gateway counted, which lowered an or else excellent referee efficiency by Tobias Welz. How did this incredible blunder happened?

Dr. Jochen Drees, VAR job manager at the DFB, very first discusses the laws on a Moukokomand: In offside circumstances in which the goalkeeper is influenced, there are generally two elements. If there is a challenger in the perspective of the goalkeeper and also Does this plainly block the sight?

After that, according to Drees, the complying with need to be observed: When influencing an apparent activity by the challenger in the instant aesthetic location of the goalkeeper ( Obvious Activity ), it is also pertinent whether the goalkeeper still has a reasonable possibility of being able to play the ball.

In the 88th minute of the Friday evening game in Freiburg, Marius Wolf increased right in the charge area to the far edge to 3: 1 for Borussia Dortmund. BVB striker Youssoufa Moukoko was offside at this conclusion and went up close to SC keeper Mark Flekken, there was practically an accident. It is clear that Moukoko flekken influenced in his flexibility of movement, i.e. was culpable off.

Inquiry regarding Flekken’s practical possibility of protection

So Drees verifies the Moukoko classification, yet also explains: The situation is not easy in the evaluation. If the round had been made flekken, for example in the short corner in the short corner, it would not have actually been a criminal affecting of Moukoko.

What Drees as well as the sporting direction of the elite umpires motivated the following judgment: Eventually, in this situation it is a specialist misjudgment of the situation. Since of the sovereignty of interpretation of the umpire Advised an on-Field testimonial, our assumption would have been that the VAR team would have appropriately judged the scene as well as. It would have needed to involve the final thought that the goal must not count due to a criminal offside placement.

What happened at the check of the scene in the Cologne video clip facility in inquiry? In the present case, the VAR team identified the offside placement of the Dortmund gamer Moukoko and his activity near Freiburg goalkeeper Flekken. Sensible defense possibility of flekken.

for Freiburg stays a bitter aftertaste

BVB demonstrator Youssoufa Moukoko was offside at this final thought and also moved up close to SC keeper Mark Flekken, there was almost an accident. It is clear that Moukoko flekken influenced in his liberty of activity, i.e. was punishable off.

In such situations, the policies as well as their analysis are not constantly entirely reasonable. Regardless, a bitter aftertaste stays for SC Freiburg. Even if it did not look like an objective of the hosts in this stage, theoretically there would have been a few minutes the chance of a 2-2.

In the present case, the VAR team recognized the offside position of the Dortmund gamer Moukoko and his activity near Freiburg goalkeeper Flekken. Realistic protection opportunity of flekken.

BVB

In the previous season, Freiburg had already received a offside goal that was not dealt with by the VAR. After the 1-1 win over Mainz in mid-February 2022, referee Deniz Aytekin confessed that the scene was just forgotten throughout the goal check as a result of suspicion of the Var.